Monday, August 31, 2009

Bracing for Space News


So I’m bracing myself for the next announcement by the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee, which is supposed to be sometime today.

The group agreed to retire the shuttle in 2011, extend the ISS until 2020 and use commercial rockets. NASA's lunar program, Constellation, is running $50 billion over budget; not terribly inspiring news in a recession, but other alternatives are equally expensive, requiring $20 billion more than the current budget.

Thunder rumbles, and if the recent darkening of clouds in the coverage of the HSFPC meetings are any indication of final outcome, it seems impossible to embark upon manned missions to the Moon or Mars in our immediate future. The debates could fill an entire blog, but here’s a taste:

Buzz Aldrin: Why We Need To Go To Mars
Moon? Been there. The outspoken Apollo astronaut says skip it and keep on boldly going. He makes a compelling argument as to why Mars should be the focus of the nation… but will people agree with him that Mars should be a ONE-WAY TRIP?

Joseph Rom: Sorry, Buzz Aldrin, we’re not sending people to Mars
Is he a pragmatist or just a big downer?

Statement by Michael Griffin to the Committee
The previous NASA administrator defends his original “moon first” plan, saying full commitment to a Mars voyage without first gaining long-term experience in living off-planet is too risky. However, he continues to emphasize that “Our goal should be broader than any single option.”

Short but Bold Statement by Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford
My favorite summary. And, um... definitely the first time I’ve ever looked at someone in Congress and thought, “You go girl!

No More Small Steps, Let Alone Giant Leaps?
Sally Ride's presentation at the final HSFPC meeting

One line of reasoning that stood out was Griffin’s comment that wherever the focus turns, no goals will be achieved during any single presidential administration or any single generation. He analogized that even if we choose one jet design over another in the course of development, we don’t screech to a halt every four years and “debate the purpose” of the US Air Force. Pretty darned good point.

Of course, the future of our space-faring activity is complex and charged with emotions, dangers, costs and national pride... but while we’re arguing about it, China’s going to the moon. And I just keep thinking to myself, if all this is going on before the report is released, the aftermath will be explosive.


Jonathan X said...

Letting Griffin go was a huge mistake. That still pisses me off.

brian said...

Nice post. Note that the report release date has been pushed back to mid-September. We'll have to bite our nails a while longer. Of course, the real drama comes when Obama and Congress decide what to do based on the information supplied by the Commission.

Sach said...

Yeah, but Griffin wasn't a democrat! (JOKING joking.... :))

Watching the Van Braun Interviews from the 70s makes it clear that the shuttle was supposed to do SO much, but that didn't work out after the Challenger incident was made clear. On top of that the space station, only went over budget a 'few' times over.

All the inefficiencies need be stopped of course, but I hope they also do something new and bold!

I also hope in 2016 the space station be 'given away' to 'someone else', instead of plunging the $100 billion thing into the sea. The Russians have already been making plans to detach at least their part of the station and save it!

web design said...

Very good post and i actually hope that those chinese guys are faster going to go to the moon, because that will bring in our space exploration one new competitor and competition as we all know is a good thing ;)